Josephus called himself plainly «Ἰώσηπος Ματθίου παῖς ἐξ Ἱεροσολύμων ἱερεύς»: Joseph son of Matthias, a priest from Jerusalem, who had fought the Romans at first and then watched the rest of the war against his will.1 He was born in the first year of the emperor Gaius (Caligula), AD 37 or 38,2,3 and died some time after 94, probably around 100.3,4,5 Much of what we know about Judaea in the age of Herod, Pontius Pilate and the great Jewish revolt against Rome comes from him.5
A priest of Jerusalem
He opens his autobiography with his family: «Ἐμοὶ δὲ γένος ἐστὶν οὐκ ἄσημον, ἀλλʼ ἐξ ἱερέων ἄνωθεν καταβεβηκός», “The family from which I am derived is not an ignoble one, but hath descended all along from the priests”. His father's line belonged to the first of the twenty-four rotas of priests who served in the Temple, and through his mother he claimed descent from the Hasmonean kings.2,5 By his own account he was a prodigy, consulted on the law by the chief priests at fourteen; he tried out all three Jewish schools and a desert hermit before, at nineteen, beginning public life as a follower of the Pharisees; whether he ever counted himself one of them is debated.5,6 At about twenty-six, probably in 64, he sailed to Rome to plead for some imprisoned priests. His ship sank in the Adriatic, and some six hundred people “swam for our lives all the night” before about eighty were picked up. Landing at Puteoli, he made friends with a Jewish actor, Aliturus, who introduced him to Nero's wife Poppaea, and the priests were freed.3,7
General in Galilee
Debated among scholars When the revolt broke out in 66, Josephus was sent to Galilee, but his two accounts of why disagree. The Jewish War says he was made general of both Galilees;8 the Life says he and two other priests were sent to persuade the troublemakers to lay down their arms.9 His translator H. St J. Thackeray called the two accounts “both biased and in some details inconsistent”.3
In 67 the Roman general Vespasian besieged him in the hill town of Jotapata (Yodfat), which fell in July after forty-seven days.3,10 Josephus jumped into a pit that led to a hidden cave, where forty men of rank were hiding.11
Ancient tradition / legend What happened next we know only from him. His companions refused to surrender, so Josephus proposed that they draw lots, each man killing the next. He was left alive with one other man, “whether we must say it happened so by chance, or whether by the providence of God”, and persuaded him to live too.12 A mathematical puzzle based on the story is still called the “Josephus problem”.5 The historian Mary Smallwood judged that he “was guilty of shocking duplicity at Jotapata, saving himself by sacrifice of his companions”.5
Brought before Vespasian, he asked to speak in private: «ἐγὼ δὲ ἄγγελος ἥκω σοι μειζόνων», “I come to thee as a messenger of greater tidings”, and then «σὺ Καῖσαρ, Οὐεσπασιανέ, καὶ αὐτοκράτωρ, σὺ καὶ παῖς ὁ σὸς οὗτος», “Thou, O Vespasian, art Caesar and emperor, thou, and this thy son”.13 This is not only his own boast: the Roman biographer Suetonius also tells how “Josephus by name, as he was being put in chains, declared most confidently that he would soon be released by the same man, who would then, however, be emperor.”14
The prophecy came true in 69. The new emperor set him free, and at Titus' suggestion his chain was cut with an axe rather than unlocked, so that he would be “like a man that had never been bound at all”.15 He took the family name of his patrons, Flavius.5
Between two fires
In 70 he was with Titus at the siege of Jerusalem, as interpreter and go-between.3 The Jews wanted him dead, and “the Romans also, whenever they were beaten, supposed that it was occasioned by my treachery”. When the city fell he asked Titus for the freedom of some of his countrymen and was given sacred books as a gift; soon afterwards he won the release of his brother and fifty friends, and, allowed into the Temple, he freed about a hundred and ninety people he knew among the captives.16 In Rome Vespasian “gave me an apartment in his own house, which he lived in before he came to the empire. He also honored me with the privilege of a Roman citizen, and gave me an annual pension”; Domitian later made his land in Judaea free of tax.17
Four books
The Jewish War, in seven books, came first.18,19 He says he had written it before in his own language for the peoples of the East, and now meant “to translate those books into the Greek tongue”.1 That first version, probably in Aramaic, is lost; the Greek shows no sign of being a translation and seems to have been written afresh, probably between 75 and 79.20 Titus wanted the world to learn the facts from these books alone, so “he subscribed his own hand to them, and ordered that they should be published”.20,21
The Jewish Antiquities, in twenty books, runs from the creation of the world to the twelfth year of Nero. Josephus finished it, he says, in the thirteenth year of Domitian and the fifty-sixth of his own life: AD 93–94.4,22 Thackeray saw it as a Jewish answer to the twenty books of Roman Antiquities by Dionysius of Halicarnassus.22 The Life was added at its end, chiefly to defend his conduct in Galilee against a rival historian, Justus of Tiberias.3,17 Against Apion, in two books, defends the antiquity of the Jewish people against those who slandered them and against the doubt raised by the silence of the famous Greek historians,23 and preserves many quotations from books now lost.3
His Greek
Greek was his second language, and he said so. He boasts of his learning, but admits «τὴν δὲ περὶ τὴν προφορὰν ἀκρίβειαν πάτριος ἐκώλυσεν συνήθεια»: in William Whiston's version, “I have so long accustomed myself to speak our own tongue, that I cannot pronounce Greek with sufficient exactness”.4 For the War, he says, he used «τισι πρὸς τὴν Ἑλληνίδα φωνὴν συνεργοῖς», “some helpers for the Greek language” (our translation). Whiston, whose English is the one in the reader, made this “I made use of some persons to assist me in learning the Greek tongue”, but the Greek speaks of helpers with the writing, not of lessons.20,24
Thackeray built a theory on that sentence. He found the War written in the polished, old-fashioned Attic Greek admired in the first century, careful even to avoid clashing vowels; he heard Josephus' own rougher voice in the Life; and in Books 17–19 of the Antiquities he saw a hack assistant slavishly imitating Thucydides.20 The War itself opens with an echo: its «μεγίστου τοῦδε τοῦ κινήματος», “this very great upheaval” (our translation), recalls Thucydides' «κίνησις γὰρ αὕτη μεγίστη».1,20,25
Jesus, John and James
Debated among scholars Book 18 of the Antiquities has a paragraph about Jesus, the Testimonium Flavianum, which begins «Γίνεται δὲ κατὰ τοῦτον τὸν χρόνον Ἰησοῦς σοφὸς ἀνήρ, εἴγε ἄνδρα αὐτὸν λέγειν χρή», “Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man”, and says «ὁ χριστὸς οὗτος ἦν», “He was [the] Christ”.26 Many scholars argue that Josephus, a Jew, could not have written that, and in the third century Origen says that Josephus did not believe in Jesus as the Christ, «ἀπιστῶν τῷ Ἰησοῦ ὡς Χριστῷ».27,28 Most scholars now think Josephus wrote a shorter notice that a Christian hand later improved; a minority think the whole paragraph a forgery.28,29 Two other passages are generally accepted as his: the account of John the Baptist, put to death by Herod,29,30 and the stoning of “the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James”.28,31
Masada
Debated among scholars The War ends with its most famous scene. In 73, or by a proposed later dating 74, the last rebels held out on the rock of Masada.32 When the Romans broke through the wall,32 says Josephus, their leader Eleazar persuaded them to kill their families and then one another: «οἳ τὸν ἀριθμὸν ἦσαν ἑξήκοντα πρὸς τοῖς ἐνακοσίοις», “Those others were nine hundred and sixty in number”. Only “an ancient woman, and another who was of kin to Eleazar” survived, hidden with five children, to tell the Romans.33 Josephus is the only ancient source, and scholars disagree about what the remains show: the historian Shaye Cohen called his account “incomplete and inaccurate”, while the archaeologist Jodi Magness has written that archaeology can neither prove nor disprove it.32
Why he matters
Next to the Bible, Josephus is the chief source for Judaea in the Second Temple period, and the only extended eyewitness of the revolt whose account survives.5,19 For centuries Jews distrusted him as a traitor, while Christian monks copied him and kept him alive.5,29 The geographer Carl Ritter put the case for and against him in one line: “Josephus is, however, to be used with great care.”5