Epictetus was a Greek philosopher of the Stoic school who lived from about AD 50 to about 135.1,2 He was a slave in his youth and became a teacher known across the Roman world, yet he never published a word: everything we can read of him we owe to a pupil, Arrian.2,3,4 His whole teaching grows from one question that anyone can ask on a bad day: is this up to me, or not?5
A slave in Rome
The Byzantine encyclopedia called the Suda says that he came from Hierapolis in Phrygia,6 a Greek city in what is now western Turkey.2 Nobody knows when he was born; about AD 50 is the usual estimate.3 Even his name tells us little: the Greek adjective ἐπίκτητος simply means “gained besides” or “acquired”, and the name his parents gave him is unknown.2,7 An inscription from Pisidia says that his mother was a slave. Whether or not that is true, it is certain that he came to Rome as a slave in the household of Epaphroditus, a freedman who served the emperor Nero as his secretary.3
While still a slave, Epictetus took lessons from Musonius Rufus, a Roman senator and Stoic philosopher who taught at Rome.1,4 He remembered how Rufus tested him: “Rufus, in order to try me, used to say: This and this will befall you from your master”.8
Once freed, he began to teach on his own at Rome.1 Then, under the emperor Domitian, a decree of the Senate expelled the philosophers from Rome and from Italy. The Roman writer Aulus Gellius, later in the second century, adds that “Epictetus too left Rome for Nicopolis because of that decree” (our translation of his Latin).9 Nicopolis, on the Adriatic coast of north-western Greece, was an important centre of travel and government,1 and Epictetus speaks of himself as one “who dwell in Nicopolis, where there are so many earthquakes”.10 He taught there for the rest of his life.1
Debated among scholars The year of the expulsion is disputed: the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives 89, W. A. Oldfather's Loeb edition 89 or 92, Wikipedia about 93, and Gerard Boter 94.1,2,3,4 The date of his death is even less certain. It is usually put between about 125 and 135, but the Suda says that he lived on into the reign of Marcus Aurelius (161–180).1,3,6
The lame old man
Epictetus was lame, and he spoke of it without self-pity: “what else can I do, a lame old man, than sing hymns to God?”11 The Handbook turns it into a lesson: «χώλανσις σκέλους ἐστὶν ἐμπόδιον, προαιρέσεως δὲ οὔ», “Lameness is an impediment to the leg, but not to the will.”12
Ancient tradition / legend Why he was lame, nobody knows. The pagan critic Celsus, quoted by the Christian writer Origen, told the famous story: when his master was twisting his leg, Epictetus smiled and said calmly «κατάσσεις», “you will break it”; and when it broke, “Didn't I tell you that you would break it?” (our translation).13 The Suda says instead that his leg was crippled by rheumatism, «πηρωθεὶϲ δὲ τὸ ϲκέλοϲ ὑπὸ ῥεύματοϲ»,6 and the sixth-century philosopher Simplicius only that he was lame from early in life.4
Debated among scholars His family life is uncertain too. He lived alone for a long time, and late in life he took in a friend's child who would otherwise have been left to die. The Stanford Encyclopedia says that he never married; Oldfather that in old age he took a wife to help him bring the child up; the ancient evidence, chiefly a remark of Simplicius, is ambiguous.1,2,4
He lived simply. He tells his pupils that a thief once stole the iron lamp that stood by his household gods, and that he said to himself: “To-morrow, I said, you will find an earthen lamp”.14 Later in the second century the satirist Lucian laughed at a man who “paid three thousand drachmas for the earthenware lamp of Epictetus the Stoic”, hoping to dream his way into the wisdom of “that marvellous old man”.3,15
What survives, and who wrote it down
Like Socrates, Epictetus published nothing.3,4 We owe him to Flavius Arrian, a Greek from Nicomedia in Bithynia who studied with him as a young man and went on to become a Roman consul and the historian of Alexander the Great.16,17 Lucian calls him “Arrian, the disciple of Epictetus, a Roman of the highest distinction”.18
In a letter at the head of the Discourses, Arrian insists that he did not “write” them at all: “whatever I heard him say, the same I attempted to write down in his own words as nearly as possible”, as notes for himself, which then reached the public “without either my consent or my knowledge”.19 The talks belong to Epictetus' later years at Nicopolis, around 108 by the usual dating.1,33
Arrian's record was large. The Byzantine scholar Photius knew “the Lectures of Epictetus his master, with eight books of which we are acquainted, and the Conversations of Epictetus in twelve books”,20 and Gellius tells of a Stoic on a ship who took from his bag “the fifth book” of Epictetus' discourses arranged by Arrian (our translation).21 Only four books survive.1,4
Debated among scholars Are they his own words? They are in Koine, the everyday Greek of the time, not the polished Attic Greek of Arrian's own books, and their blunt, quick manner is unlike his, so the mainstream view trusts them as a record of Epictetus' teaching, if not word for word. At the extremes, some have held that Arrian largely composed them himself, and a few, notably Robert Dobbin, that Epictetus wrote them.1,3,4,33
The second work is the Handbook, in Greek Ἐγχειρίδιον (Encheiridion), a book to have “in the hand”.7 Arrian made it himself from the Discourses,3,22 and somewhat more than half of it can be traced in the four surviving books.22 It has fifty-three short chapters.23 Quotations in later collections, above all the anthology of Stobaeus, keep scraps of the lost books.3
Up to us, and not up to us
The Handbook opens with the whole philosophy in one sentence: «τῶν ὄντων τὰ μέν ἐστιν ἐφʼ ἡμῖν, τὰ δὲ οὐκ ἐφʼ ἡμῖν», in George Long's English “Of things some are in our power, and others are not.”5 In our power, it goes on, are our opinions, our impulses, our desires and aversions: in a word, our own acts. Not in our power are the body, property, reputation and office; they are “weak, slavish, subject to restraint, in the power of others”.5
At the centre stands a word Epictetus made his own, προαίρεσις (prohairesis). The dictionary gives “choosing one thing before another”, then purpose or resolve;7 translators write “will”, “moral purpose” or “volition”.1,4,24 It is the one thing no one can take from us. Imagine, he says, a tyrant threatening chains: «τὸ σκέλος μου δήσεις, τὴν προαίρεσιν δὲ οὐδʼ ὁ Ζεὺς νικῆσαι δύναται», “You may fetter my leg, but my will not even Zeus himself can overpower.”24 And what upsets us is never the event itself: «ταράσσει τοὺς ἀνθρώπους οὐ τὰ πράγματα, ἀλλὰ τὰ περὶ τῶν πραγμάτων δόγματα», “Men are disturbed not by the things which happen, but by the opinions about the things”.25
What reading him is like
The Discourses are not lectures but talk: a teacher arguing with a pupil, a visitor or an imaginary objector, now heartfelt, now satirical.1,3 He did not want his pupils comfortable: «ἰατρεῖόν ἐστιν, ἄνδρες, τὸ τοῦ φιλοσόφου σχολεῖον», “The philosopher's school, ye men, is a surgery: you ought not to go out of it with pleasure, but with pain.”26 And he could be tender: «τί γὰρ ἄλλο δύναμαι γέρων χωλὸς εἰ μὴ ὑμνεῖν τὸν θεόν;», and “If then I was a nightingale, I would do the part of a nightingale.”11 Gellius heard from the philosopher Favorinus that Epictetus summed up his advice in two words, «ἀνέχου» and «ἀπέχου»,27,28 which Boter renders “bear and forbear”.3
Why he matters
Marcus Aurelius, emperor from 161, thanked his teacher Rusticus for introducing him to «τοῖς Ἐπικτητείοις ὑπομνήμασιν», “the notes of Epictetus” (our translation),3,29 and he quotes him: «Ψυχάριον εἶ βαστάζον νεκρόν, ὡς Ἐπίκτητος ἔλεγεν», “You are a little soul carrying a corpse, as Epictetus used to say” (our translation).30 About 248, in his reply to the pagan Celsus, the Christian Origen observed that Plato was handled only by the learned, while Epictetus was admired even by ordinary people, «καὶ ὑπὸ τῶν τυχόντων», who felt that his words made them better.3,31,42 In the sixth century Simplicius wrote a huge commentary on the Handbook,3,22 and Greek monks reworked the Handbook three times as a guide for monastic life, sometimes putting Paul where Epictetus had named Socrates.3,22
In the Renaissance Niccolò Perotti (1450) and Angelo Poliziano (1479) translated the Handbook into Latin, and Poliziano's version, printed in 1497, was the first printed edition of the Handbook.3,23 Elizabeth Carter's English translation of all the works came out in London in 1758.3 In the twentieth century the psychotherapist Albert Ellis built his Rational-Emotive Therapy on the opening line of Handbook 5,3 and in Tom Wolfe's novel A Man in Full (1998) a young man in prison finds strength in Epictetus.1,3